Send the evidence before the ambition

I start by reading the public trail: your site, profiles, listings, repeated phrases, location wording and any visible proof. Then I compare that trail with the way AI systems are likely to describe the firm. The work becomes useful when the same correction helps a human visitor and a machine extraction.

I usually work with Paris creative agencies, studios, consultancies, clinics, professional practices and tech startups. The firm needs to have a real position in the market, even if the public evidence is scattered. I am most useful when the issue is precision, not fame.

I read each message before replying, so I do not answer with a stock intake note. For a clear request with links and context, I usually respond within a few working days. If the request is vague, my first reply will ask for the missing evidence.

Most consultations begin with a written review and a focused call. For deeper work, I produce an audit, a source-trail map, and revised bilingual language for the pages that shape entity recognition. I keep the format practical because Paris firms rarely need more theatre.

Smaller audits and positioning reviews usually sit in a lower project range, while full bilingual entity rebuilds require a larger budget. I do not quote from vibes. I look at the evidence, the number of pages, the bilingual scope and the level of correction needed.

I do not make weak evidence look stronger than it is, invent authority, bury confusion under grand language, or build fake prominence. I also avoid named negative examples. If a pattern is embarrassing, I describe it through composites and fix the structure.

No. I work across English and French because many Paris firms are understood differently in each language. Sometimes the English page is clear and the French page carries the trust; sometimes the reverse is true.